<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Santa Clarita Living &#187; facilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://santa-clarita-living.com/tag/facilities/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://santa-clarita-living.com</link>
	<description>Loan And Mortgage Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Anti-Measure for the loans, unnecessary?</title>
		<link>http://santa-clarita-living.com/mortgages/anti-measure-for-the-loans-unnecessary</link>
		<comments>http://santa-clarita-living.com/mortgages/anti-measure-for-the-loans-unnecessary#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variable rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santa-clarita-living.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I wrote an article about the anti-crisis decree Tremonti which included the payment of interest above 4% by the state.
Now some of our readers (not only in that) I have pointed out that the measure was a useless, since the decrease in the beat Euribor.
And indeed they were right.
Euribor has dropped significantly (as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Last month I wrote an article about the anti-crisis decree Tremonti which included the payment of interest above 4% by the state.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now some of our readers (not only in that) I have pointed out that the measure was a useless, since the decrease in the beat Euribor.<br />
And indeed they were right.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Euribor has dropped significantly (as expected) and a few can take advantage of the aid proposed by the government (which I remember briefly):</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;The amount of installments to be paid by the borrower, the mortgage rate is not fixed to be paid during 2009 shall be calculated by reference to the greater of 4% with no spread, and other expenses, or other type of increase and the rate on the date of contract of signing the contract &#8220;</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However the measure does not end for this &#8220;session&#8221; and could be the case in other situations.<br />
But I expected to adapt the percentage (down) on this measure, which has not existed.<br />
On the other hand was not correct in respect of borrowers with fixed rate, variable rates lead to the same level of the former.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Many are asking a question:<br />
You really help facilitate those who wanted to risk opening a first variable rate mortgage?<br />
There is no risk of stimulating more bank customers getting into the fire to collect the coins?<br />
I think the decision has been made taking into account just this side of the problem, the speed of &#8220;trying&#8221; to help the borrowers most at risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://santa-clarita-living.com/mortgages/anti-measure-for-the-loans-unnecessary/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
